Beijing’s counter-report is likely meant to reinforce its longstanding position that the award is “null and void,” but its publication also highlights a deeper divide: China argues sovereignty and jurisdiction were never properly adjudicated, while Manila and its partners insist the award settled the maritime entitlements issue with finality. Reuters and AP both show that the international diplomatic consensus outside Beijing still leans strongly toward the Philippine view.

MANILA — On the 10th anniversary of the PCA award, the Philippines stood at the center of a renewed chorus calling the ruling “final and binding,” using legal victory as both shield and lever in a neighborhood reshaped by naval build‑up and strategic hedging. The 14‑nation statement backing Manila’s win reflected the country’s success in translating a complex UNCLOS arbitration into enduring diplomatic capital.

The reaffirmation comes as the 10th anniversary of the ruling drew international attention. On 12 July 2026, the Philippines and 13 partner countries issued a joint statement reaffirming the award as “final and binding” and saying there is no legal basis for China’s expansive maritime claims. Beijing responded by denouncing that statement and urging the countries to stop “spreading lies” about the arbitration.

MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines and 13 other countries have called on China to abide by the 2016 arbitral award on the West Philippine Sea, reaffirming that the ruling is “final, legally binding, and definitive” between the Philippines and China on the maritime claims covered by the tribunal.

On 12 July 2016, an arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) issued a landmark award in The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China. The tribunal held that China’s claims to historic rights within the “nine-dash line” had no lawful effect beyond entitlements available under UNCLOS, and it found multiple Chinese actions unlawful vis-à-vis the Philippines’ rights in its exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

The Hague ruling remains the Philippines’ strongest international-law asset because it directly undermined key elements of China’s maritime claims . That is why Philippine officials and legal advocates continue to cite UNCLOS and the award when pressing their case on the West Philippine Sea.

Article by J. Salazar Published on July 9, 2026 04:30PM A China Coast Guard vessel patrols the vibrant blue waters as smaller boats navigate nearby The Philippines has firmly rejected claims that it undermines efforts toward stability in the West Philippine Sea, insisting that its statements and actions, centered on sovereignty over Bajo de Masinloc (Internationally known as Scarborough Shoal or Huangyan Dao in China), are entirely consistent with international law and aimed

The 12 July 2016 Award rendered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague determined that China’s claims of historic rights within the South China Sea, as represented by its so-called nine-dash line, have no legal basis under international law.